Wake Up
Patriots
Federal and State
laws overrule company
policies. Company policies must
be in accordance with federal and state
laws for them to be a valid policy.
According to Virginia Law,
subsection 18.2-422, any person above the age of 16 that wears a mask in public
(unless for participation in a religious ceremony) can be punished as a class
six felon.
One might say that public
safety supersedes Federal or State law.
Although I agree that public safety is important, wearing a face mask is
not always the answer. As an American, I
believe strongly in those rights and guarantees that are found in our United
States Constitution. I believe that
mandatory face mask violates my right to make a decision about my own personal
health and integrity. Again, I say to
you that Federal and State laws overrule policies. Policies must be in accordance with federal and state laws for any policy to be a valid policy.
I believe that mandatory face
masks are discriminatory. It is
discriminatory against one that might have a health condition. Even Governor Northam’s (VA) Executive Order
63 Requirement to Wear Face Covering
While Inside Buildings includes exclusions such as:
1.
While eating or drinking;
2.
Individuals exercising or using exercise
equipment;
3.
Any person who has trouble breathing, or is
unconscious, incapacitated, or otherwise unable to remove the face covering
without assistance;
4.
Any person seeking to communicate with the
hearing impaired and for which the mouth needs to be visible;
5.
When temporary removal of the face covering is
necessary to secure government or medical services; and
6.
Persons with health conditions that prohibit
wearing a face covering. Nothing in this Order shall require the use of a face
covering by any person for whom doing so would be contrary to his or her health
or safety because of a medical condition.
Additional, Northam’s
executive order 63 states any
person who declines to wear a face covering because of a medical condition
shall not be required to produce or carry medical documentation verifying the
stated condition nor shall the person be required to identify the precise
underlying medical condition.
Northam’s Executive Order is not enforceable by law enforcement
personnel; Virginia’s Department of Health is responsible to enforce executive
order 63.
When the flu came to America
in 1918 and 1919 there were 650,000 estimated deaths in America in group ranges
five and under, 20-40, and 65 and older; no one wore a mask![1]
In 2017 there were 13.5 abortions per 1000 live births in
America, and no one wore masks! Using formulas based on the way the birth
control pill works, pharmacy experts project that about 14 million chemical
abortions occur in the United States each year, providing a projected
total of well in excess of 610 million chemical abortions between 1965 and
2009.[2]
Two more final thoughts about
mandatory masks, instead of promoting public safety by wearing masks, we are
witnessing across the board commission of unconcealed crimes while wearing a
face mask in the commission of that crime.
This being condoned by our liberal government.
I believe it was Diane Feinstein
that asked Amy Coney Barrett on 10-14-2020 when Barrett would use international
law to make Supreme Court decision. That
alarms me on several levels; and some of my reasons follow:
We are not governed under
International Law, we are governed under the Constitution of the United States.
International law is the body
of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states
and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors. The International Law Commission was
established by the General Assembly in 1947 to promote the progressive (key
word - Progressive) development of international law and its codification. The
Commission is composed of 34 members who collectively represent the world’s
principal legal systems, and serve as experts in their individual capacity, not
as representatives of their governments. They address issues relevant to regulation of
relations among and between states, and frequently consult with the
International Committee of the Red Cross, the International Court of Justice
and UN specialized agencies, depending on the subject. Often, the Commission
also prepares drafts on aspects of international law.
Constitutional Law is the
body of law that evolves from a constitution, setting out the fundamental principles according to
which a state is governed and defining the relationship between the various
branches of government within the state.
My understanding of
International Law is that International Law does not address specific Rights of
a Citizen. Guess what that means, it
means do away with Constitutional Law and you give up your inalienable rights
guaranteed to you by the Constitution of the United States. As a conscious thinker, I am certain you can
articulate implications of enforcing International Laws in America rather than
Constitutional Law?
Typically the United Nations
is invited into a country that is at war with itself. When that happens the United Nations takes
over control of assets of the country into which they (the United Nations) were
invited to help settle unrest. When the
fighting ends, the United Nations establishes International Law in that country
and they (the United Nations) leave their “Peacekeepers” behind to enforce
International Law while they train local authorities to enforce International
Law.
Get ready for the fighting to
begin - as soon as the election is over and no matter who wins the election –
there will be fighting. If the
conservatives win, we will find ourselves fighting the intolerance from the
left. If the left wins, conservatives
will have to fight for their inalienable rights.
We have been given every
evidence that the left will fight. Look
across the country and see the wake that has been left behind after all of the
George Soros’ and his Open Society Foundation funded riots across America from
Baltimore Maryland to Portland Oregon.
Similar riots occurred from Houston Texas Minneapolis Minnesota. No part of our community of America within
its northern, southern, eastern, and western borders is immune from riotous
behavior. Thanks to LGBQT many across
America identify as “they”. Thanks to
the “they” community we have bought off on the New York’s idea to recognize 31
gender identities; many of which rely upon surgery to add body parts or remove
body parts, or to enhance body parts or cause the diminution of body parts.
Thanks to the intolerance of
liberals, we have been desensitized to riotous behavior and as black lives
matters snowballs their blm movement, we find that really no lives matter
because we all accept and allow illegal behavior. Thanks to Vicky Osterweil’s new book In Defense of Looting and if we believe
Osterweil’s crazy stupid interpretation of looting; we will believe that
looting is no more that liberating one of their possession(s) and gifting that
possessions(s) to someone else and all the vandalism and death that results do
not matter. And by the way, when you are
liberated of your possession(s), be prerpared to:
1.
Pay all the
damages, and
2.
Replace your
possession(s).
This blog is too long for a
blog; sorry - but I feel this is important information and if you got this far,
thank you for hanging in there with me. Get
out there and vote for the guy and the party that can pull us out of the
quagmire of illegal behavior that we have come to know as acceptable behavior. And if you got this far I am going to tell
you something that you probably do not know. The Finnish word for Horrible it Kamala. Go ahead, fact check
that. GOD Bless! Semper Fidelis!
Comments
Post a Comment